General Description
You can customize the results view for the conflict check by arranging, grouping, and showing or hiding columns, and then save your settings.
This allows you to configure a results view that best fits your needs.
Logging in to STP Cloud (Legal Twin)
Among other things, you’ll find this in the Ribbon Bar
Filters
There are various filters available for the view, which you can set using the options.
For example, checks are performed against contact types, simply distinguishing whether they are different types.
Typically, the following are distinguished:
- Active clients
- Former clients
- Opponents/Counterparties
- Third parties involved, e.g., judges, experts
- Prospects/Leads – there may already be a confidentiality obligation here
Basically, the marked options only filter out phonetic matches from the results view; direct contacts are not filtered out. For better clarity, you should categorize the results view by relationships as shown in the example.
No matches for free conflict checks
If this option is selected, free conflict checks will not be shown in the object list.
No matches for other contact types (phonetic)
If entries are found with a different contact type, they will be hidden.
No matches for other salutations (phonetic)
Matches with different salutations will not be considered.
Only matches for free conflict checks
If this option is selected, only matches for free conflict checks will be shown in the object list.
Only matches for other contact types (phonetic)
If the matches are for different contact types, they will be shown.
Only matches for other salutations (phonetic) Matches with different salutations will be shown with this option.
You can set default options for these selections. Here you can define which options are selected when you open the view.
To do this, go to
Administration > System > General Settings.
On the Conflict Check tab, you can adjust the settings as needed.
Object List
The results view shows you the originating contact (conflict party) that triggered the conflict and their role (type of involvement); it also shows the reason for the match:
Factual conflict: the conflict keyword matches and the description sounds phonetically similar.
Potential conflict: the contact was found by the search algorithms in other files or conflict checks without a file reference.
Name on the collision list: e.g., blacklist, EU sanctions list, the conflict party phonetically matches values from a collision list entry.
Insider: the conflict party phonetically matches values from an insider entry for an employee. The view shows the found target contact, their type of involvement, and file information. If the found target contact is part of a group, the parent company (with the parent company box checked for organizations) will be shown for the contact.
Additionally, the relationship between the originating contact and the target contact is displayed:
1 Direct contact: The target contact is the same as the originating contact.
2 Group: The target contact is in a group with the originating contact.
3 Representative: The target contact has a representative relationship (represents/is represented by) with the originating contact.
4 Group representative: The target contact has a representative relationship with a contact who is in a group with the originating contact.
5 Phonetic: The target contact was found due to phonetic similarity.
Generate Conflict Journal
The conflict journal adopts the conflict check results view. This means if you have grouped the view and only expanded one group, it will appear the same way in the journal.
Use the option to hide columns to make the journal easier to read and fit it to a single page width.
This article has been automatically translated by an AI and may therefore contain errors.
Related to